Skip to content
NewNeed a law or country we don't cover yet? Tell us, and see what's coming next.What's coming →
GlanceDesk™Jurisdiction

Home › Compare laws side by side › LGPD vs EU GDPR

LGPD vs EU GDPR

Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (Law No. 13,709/2018) (Brazil) compared with Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation) (European Union (EEA)) on the same topics. Every value comes from the law pages, which link to the official sources.

TopicLGPD
Brazil
13/14 facts confirmed by two sources
EU GDPR
European Union (EEA)
✓ Confirmed by two sources
StatusIn force. ANPD became a regulatory agency under Law 15,352/2026 (signed 25 Feb 2026).✓In force since 25 May 2018. Digital Omnibus amendments proposed Nov 2025, not adopted as of Oct 2026.✓
Who it applies toAny public or private processing, wherever the company is based, if processing happens in Brazil, aims to offer goods or services to or process data of people in Brazil, or the data was collected in Brazil.✓Any organisation processing personal data in the context of an EU establishment, plus non-EU organisations that offer goods/services to people in the EU or monitor their behaviour there.✓
Size thresholdsNo size or revenue thresholds. Small processing agents (micro/small businesses, startups) get a simplified regime under ANPD Resolution 2/2022, unless they do high-risk processing.✓None — applies regardless of size. Limited record-keeping relief for organisations under 250 staff (Art 30(5)), lost if processing is risky, not occasional, or includes special-category or criminal data.✓
RegulatorAgência Nacional de Proteção de Dados (ANPD)✓National data protection authorities (DPAs), coordinated by the European Data Protection Board (EDPB)✓
Breach or incident reportingNotify the ANPD (via its electronic form) and affected data subjects within 3 business days of learning of an incident that may cause relevant risk or damage (Resolution CD/ANPD 15/2024). Keep records of all incidents for at least 5 years. Deadlines doubled for small agents.✓Notify the competent supervisory authority without undue delay and within 72 hours of becoming aware, unless the breach is unlikely to result in a risk to individuals (Art 33). If you have an EU main establishment, that is your lead authority; if you have no EU establishment (even with an EU representative), notify the authority of every member state where affected people live (EDPB Guidelines 9/2022, para 73). Tell affected individuals without undue delay if the risk is high (Art 34).✓
Deadline to answer personal data requestsConfirmation/access in simplified form immediately; complete declaration within 15 days of the request (Art. 19).✓1 month from receipt; extendable by 2 further months for complex requests if the person is told within the first month. Free of charge unless manifestly unfounded or excessive.✓
Data protection officerControllers must appoint a DPO (encarregado) and publish their identity and contact details, preferably on the website (Art. 41). Small processing agents without high-risk processing are exempt but must provide a contact channel.✓DPO mandatory for public bodies, and where core activities involve large-scale regular and systematic monitoring, or large-scale processing of special-category or criminal-offence data.✓
Local representativeNo requirement for foreign companies to appoint a local representative in Brazil.✓Non-EU controllers/processors caught by Art 3(2) must appoint an EU representative in writing, unless processing is occasional, low-risk and excludes large-scale sensitive data, or they are a public body.✓
Sending data abroadAllowed only on Art. 33 grounds: adequacy, ANPD standard contractual clauses (adopted verbatim; 12-month adoption deadline from 23 Aug 2024), specific clauses, global corporate rules, specific consent, etc. EU and Brazil granted mutual adequacy in Jan 2026.Transfers outside the EEA need an adequacy decision (e.g. UK, Switzerland, EU-US Data Privacy Framework), or safeguards such as Standard Contractual Clauses or Binding Corporate Rules, or a narrow Art 49 derogation.✓
Cookies and consentNeeds a legal basis (consent or legitimate interest). ANPD cookie guide (Oct 2022): no pre-ticked non-essential cookies, offer an easy 'reject all' on the first banner layer, and keep consent-based cookies off by default.✓Cookie/tracker consent is governed by the ePrivacy Directive Art 5(3); where consent is the GDPR legal basis it must be freely given, specific, informed, unambiguous and as easy to withdraw as to give.✓
Maximum penaltyUp to 2% of the company's (or group's) revenue in Brazil in the prior fiscal year, net of taxes, capped at R$50 million per infraction.✓Up to EUR 20 million or 4% of total worldwide annual turnover, whichever is higher (lower tier: EUR 10 million or 2%).✓

= confirmed by two independent sources, at least one official.

Facts marked “Being verified” are still being confirmed and are not given as answers.

Who each law applies to

LGPD
Any public or private processing, wherever the company is based, if processing happens in Brazil, aims to offer goods or services to or process data of people in Brazil, or the data was collected in Brazil.
EU GDPR
Any organisation processing personal data in the context of an EU establishment, plus non-EU organisations that offer goods/services to people in the EU or monitor their behaviour there.

What you must do under LGPD

Full LGPD page, sources and checklist

What you must do under EU GDPR

Full EU GDPR page, sources and checklist

Information only, not legal advice. Laws change; confirm with the regulator or a qualified lawyer before relying on this page. Spotted an error? Email contact@glancedeskjurisdiction.com.