Skip to content
NewNeed a law or country we don't cover yet? Tell us, and see what's coming next.What's coming →
GlanceDesk™Jurisdiction

Home › Compare laws side by side › DORA vs EU GDPR

DORA vs EU GDPR

Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 on digital operational resilience for the financial sector (DORA) (European Union) compared with Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation) (European Union (EEA)) on the same topics. Every value comes from the law pages, which link to the official sources.

TopicDORA
European Union
13/14 facts confirmed by two sources
EU GDPR
European Union (EEA)
✓ Confirmed by two sources
StatusApplies since 17 January 2025.✓In force since 25 May 2018. Digital Omnibus amendments proposed Nov 2025, not adopted as of Oct 2026.✓
Who it applies to20 types of EU financial entities (banks, insurers, investment firms, payment/e-money institutions, crypto-asset service providers, etc.) and the ICT third-party service providers that serve them; critical ICT providers face direct EU oversight.✓Any organisation processing personal data in the context of an EU establishment, plus non-EU organisations that offer goods/services to people in the EU or monitor their behaviour there.✓
Size thresholdsNone: applies to in-scope financial entities regardless of size, applied proportionately (Art 4). Small and non-interconnected investment firms, exempted payment and e-money institutions and small occupational pension funds use a simplified ICT risk framework (Art 16).✓None — applies regardless of size. Limited record-keeping relief for organisations under 250 staff (Art 30(5)), lost if processing is risky, not occasional, or includes special-category or criminal data.✓
RegulatorNational financial supervisors; European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, EIOPA, ESMA) oversee critical ICT third-party providers✓National data protection authorities (DPAs), coordinated by the European Data Protection Board (EDPB)✓
Breach or incident reportingMajor ICT incidents: initial notice within 4h of classifying as major and no later than 24h after awareness; intermediate report within 72h of initial notice; final report within 1 month of the latest intermediate report.✓Notify the competent supervisory authority without undue delay and within 72 hours of becoming aware, unless the breach is unlikely to result in a risk to individuals (Art 33). If you have an EU main establishment, that is your lead authority; if you have no EU establishment (even with an EU representative), notify the authority of every member state where affected people live (EDPB Guidelines 9/2022, para 73). Tell affected individuals without undue delay if the risk is high (Art 34).✓
Deadline to answer personal data requestsN/A✓1 month from receipt; extendable by 2 further months for complex requests if the person is told within the first month. Free of charge unless manifestly unfounded or excessive.✓
Data protection officerNo named officer; the management body bears ultimate responsibility for ICT risk management.✓DPO mandatory for public bodies, and where core activities involve large-scale regular and systematic monitoring, or large-scale processing of special-category or criminal-offence data.✓
Local representativeNo EU representative duty, but EU financial entities may only use a non-EU critical ICT third-party provider if it sets up an EU subsidiary within 12 months of designation (Art 31(12)).✓Non-EU controllers/processors caught by Art 3(2) must appoint an EU representative in writing, unless processing is occasional, low-risk and excludes large-scale sensitive data, or they are a public body.✓
Sending data abroadN/A✓Transfers outside the EEA need an adequacy decision (e.g. UK, Switzerland, EU-US Data Privacy Framework), or safeguards such as Standard Contractual Clauses or Binding Corporate Rules, or a narrow Art 49 derogation.✓
Cookies and consentN/A✓Cookie/tracker consent is governed by the ePrivacy Directive Art 5(3); where consent is the GDPR legal basis it must be freely given, specific, informed, unambiguous and as easy to withdraw as to give.✓
Maximum penaltySet by Member States for financial entities. Critical ICT providers: periodic penalty payments up to 1% of average daily worldwide turnover.Up to EUR 20 million or 4% of total worldwide annual turnover, whichever is higher (lower tier: EUR 10 million or 2%).✓

= confirmed by two independent sources, at least one official.

Facts marked “Being verified” are still being confirmed and are not given as answers.

Who each law applies to

DORA
20 types of EU financial entities (banks, insurers, investment firms, payment/e-money institutions, crypto-asset service providers, etc.) and the ICT third-party service providers that serve them; critical ICT providers face direct EU oversight.
EU GDPR
Any organisation processing personal data in the context of an EU establishment, plus non-EU organisations that offer goods/services to people in the EU or monitor their behaviour there.

What you must do under DORA

Full DORA page, sources and checklist

What you must do under EU GDPR

Full EU GDPR page, sources and checklist

Information only, not legal advice. Laws change; confirm with the regulator or a qualified lawyer before relying on this page. Spotted an error? Email contact@glancedeskjurisdiction.com.